Notes & assumptions
State Investment Impact · lifecycle
State investment
—
—
→
Total economic activity
—
—
—
—
—
Job-years & tax recapture
—
—
—

Lifecycle leverage: every $1 of state investment activates rooted Utah economic activity (RIMS II on facility CAPEX/OPEX) plus proxied cluster activity (anchor tenants, suppliers, visitors, workforce relocation). Construction concentrates impact in the build years; operations sustain annual flow indefinitely. Job-years are person-years of employment, not permanent jobs. The “rooted” figure is the most defensible; “+ proxied” is the expected total activity the spaceport’s existence supports. See methodology for sources.

—
—
—
—
—

Per-Capability P&L — steady state

Economic Impact by Phase

Construction is one-time and front-loaded; operations recur annually. The “Cluster activity proxy” row captures activity the spaceport activates but doesn’t itself spend (anchor tenants, suppliers, visitors, workforce relocation). Each proxy driver is itemized in the sidebar’s “Cluster Activity Proxy” card and can be edited or zeroed out. Tax recapture is state+local on earnings only — federal income tax, corporate tax, and license-fee revenue are not included.

Economic Activity by Year

Construction direct Construction ind.+ind. Ops direct (OPEX) Ops ind.+ind. Cluster proxy

Stacked output per year. Layers 1–4 are rooted (RIMS II on the facility’s own CAPEX/OPEX); the top layer is proxied cluster activity. A dashed line marks the rooted/proxied boundary. Vertical dashed lines mark construction-end and ramp-complete.

Marginal NPV by Capability

Capabilities are layered on in the order shown. Each bar is the change in cumulative NPV when that capability is added to the ones above it. Green bars are accretive, red bars are dilutive. The final row is the total NPV with all enabled capabilities active.

Annual Cash Flow & Cumulative

Revenue OPEX CAPEX Cumulative net

Sensitivity — NPV impact of ±25% on each input

Tornado of which assumption matters most. Bars to the right of zero increase NPV; bars to the left reduce it. Length is the absolute change in NPV when the named input is shifted ±25% while everything else stays at its current value.

Scenario Comparison — Quantitative Site Viability

Side-by-side quantitative comparison across scenarios. Every saved scenario gets a column capturing its own enabled capabilities, demand volumes, costs, revenue assumptions, and financial parameters. NPV is shown at the discount rate of the currently active scenario's parameters.

Methodology & Default Sources

How the model computes

For each year y from 0 to horizon:

  capex(y)   = total_CAPEX / construction_years   if y < construction_years
             = 0                                  otherwise

  ramp(y)    = min((y - construction_years + 1) / ramp_years, 1)   if y >= construction_years

  inflation(y) = (1 + inflation_rate)^(y - construction_years)

  revenue(y) = annual_revenue * ramp(y) * inflation(y)
  opex(y)    = annual_opex   * inflation(y)

  net(y)     = revenue(y) - opex(y) - capex(y)
  NPV        = sum over y of net(y) / (1 + discount_rate)^y

IRR is solved with bisection on the discount rate that drives NPV to zero. Payback is the year at which cumulative undiscounted net cash flow turns non-negative. Break-even launches/year is the multiplier on current launch demand at which steady-state revenue equals steady-state OPEX (i.e., the rate where annual operations become self-sustaining ignoring the sunk CAPEX).

Default value benchmarks

Hover the ⓘ next to any line item to see the benchmark source and rationale. Default values are anchored to public benchmarks: FAA AC 150/5320 cost guidance for airfield work; FAA AST published spaceport license fees and Part 420 documentation; comparable facility data from Spaceport America, Mid-Atlantic Regional Spaceport, Mojave Air & Space Port, and Pacific Spaceport Complex Alaska; BLM rural Utah land sale records; and FAA AST commercial space launch market projections.

These defaults are reasonable starting points, not committed cost estimates. Real engineering cost estimates require site-specific surveys, vehicle-specific propellant farm sizing, and tenant negotiations. Use this tool to explore the shape of the answer and identify which assumptions need rigorous costing.

Economic impact methodology — two layers

Layer A — Rooted (RIMS II on line items). The State Investment Impact band, the Phase-Split table, and the Activity-by-Year chart apply BEA Regional Input-Output Modeling System (RIMS II) Type II multipliers to the CAPEX and OPEX cash flows already in the model. Type II multipliers capture three effects: direct (the spaceport’s own spending), indirect (its supply chain), and induced (re-spending of wages by the workers in those firms).

Multipliers come from BEA’s published industry-summary tables: NAICS 237 (Heavy & Civil Engineering Construction) for build, and a blend of NAICS 3364 (Aerospace Mfg) and NAICS 5417 (Scientific R&D) for operations. Defaults are U.S. industry-summary midpoints from the RIMS II User’s Guide (Bureau of Economic Analysis, 2024 ed.). Override any coefficient with a Utah-state custom-region value if you procure one from BEA (~$300 per region-by-industry order).

Layer B — Cluster activity proxy. RIMS II only captures activity driven by the spaceport’s own spending. It does not capture activity that the spaceport’s existence proxies for: anchor tenants co-locating, suppliers attracted to the cluster, launch-day visitor spend, or net-new household spending from relocated workforce. Layer B models these explicitly as activity-volume-driven items (per launch, per test campaign-day, per FTE, lump per anchor tenant), then runs them through the same operations RIMS II multiplier. Each driver is itemized and editable so reviewers can scrutinize separately. The headline always shows the rooted (Layer A) figure first; the proxied (A+B) figure is shown as “+” alongside.

State-investment leverage. Each CAPEX line carries a publicShare % (editable inline next to the value). The state-investment headline is the sum of value × publicShare across active CAPEX items; the leverage ratio divides lifecycle activity by this denominator. The full CAPEX value still flows through the Type II multiplier — multipliers act on every dollar of spending, regardless of who paid.

What this is and isn’t. Type II + cluster proxy is the standard, defensible way to translate infrastructure spend into a regional economic-activity headline — the same framework that supports state economic-development analyses, Federal Register impact statements, and legislative briefings. It is not a dynamic CGE model: it does not capture crowd-out of other Utah industries, displacement of existing aerospace activity to the new site, or general-equilibrium price effects. The leverage ratio compares to a counterfactual of zero spending, not to alternative uses of the same dollars. Job-years are person-years of employment, not permanent jobs; tax recapture is state+local on earnings only.

What this model does not yet capture